Grumpier Old Men

According to The Daily Express, (The World’s Greatest Newspaper), Sharia courts have been set up throughout Britain.



Blah blah blah

But, the most disturbing bit



Charity? How TF can an organisation promoting the advancement of the Islamic religion possibly qualify as a charity?

This country has totally lost the plot under the madmen of NuLabour, who depend on the Muslim vote for their continued grip on power.

Sounds like bollox to me. The Barclay brothers are tax dodging parasites, why don't we get outraged about that?

Dirty Des owns the Express you prune. The Barclays own the Torygraph

I don't really have a problem with these idiots subjecting themselves to yet another layer of law and legal restraint as long as it is voluntary and more importantly, in addition to their obligations under UK law which must apply first.

Any attempt to negate UK law in favour of alien control must be considered as a treasonable act and punishable by forcible and permanent removal to a country which is subject to their dumb law where they can get on with it without annoying us.

Agreed. Should we let GOrdon know what we think?

Sharia Law ~ sounds like some daft bint out of a soap opera.

This is her sister Phyllida Law with Emma Thompson

Answer to the Beardies' disatisfaction with our legal system is f*ck off to Saudi Arabia or some other pox hole where life is lived under sharia law. I would wager that not one in 10 of these assets to our land has ever lived under such a system.

I and several others on here have been banging on for ages about the registered charity scandal. The abuse is so widespread that governments are shite scared to even investigate the situation.

Almost anybody can set themselves up as a registered charity. All it takes is a nice money-making scam and an alleged worthwhile cause through which to 'launder' the takings.

I would imagine that any one of our more financially minded posters on here could very quickly make huge sums of loot if they put their minds to it.....but then again, maybe they have a conscience.

The question I'd like to pose is;

How do they enforce their 'law'? I for one would take not a blind bit of notice of anything these lunatics say, because I don't acknowledge Islam as my religion.

However, what sanction do they have against moderate muslims who don't want to be subject to Sharia law, and what would plod do if one didn't agree to be bound by it?

Whose side would the UK Law be on?

Just a thought...

Sharia Law seems to call for public floggings, death and having hands chopped off for all manner of offences such as burglary, rape and kiddie fiddling.

I would have thought that these are EXACTLY the punishments that many of you lot have been screaming out for.

Sharia Law: tough on crime unlike UK law which seems to want to lock people up in five star prisons with pool tables, TV and all the drugs you can eat.

What am I missing, here?

It really doesn't matter what the public sream for Fizz, you only get one vote every four years or so.
That negates all possibility of having a say at any other time except here and on other foums.

This is a development that should be stamped on sharpish.
If the government is reluctant to let citizens act in their own defence why the hell should it let someone set up their own state-within-a-state?

Or they are too busy working on the much more lucrative VAT carousel fraud

Not only is the government permitting it, they are bleedin well funding it via the charity status scam!

Dunno what you're worried about.

Who is most likely to BRING BACK HANGING - UK or Sharia Law?

Just think - you'll get to see paedos swing from a rope every Saturday before the football starts.

That will make you happy, surely?

Eh?

Hope that wasn't directed at me, because if it was, you are obviously not reading my posts.